Blog Layout

Our Carbon Emission Reduction Target

Press Release

DETA Consulting Carbon Footprint and Target

DETA Consulting works closely with many of New Zealand’s largest energy users, and carbon emitters, to improve their carbon footprint through improved efficiencies across their organisations. We are proud of the impact that we have reducing New Zealand’s carbon footprint – to date our work has reduced carbon emissions across New Zealand industry by more than 40,000 tonnes per year. Further, we are now working with governments in the Pacific Islands to develop decarbonisation strategies.

While it’s great that we are achieving these results, we haven’t stopped often enough to focus on what to do about our own carbon footprint, which is largely dominated by air travel. Due to growth in our business, our carbon footprint was expected to increase year-on-year. This is concerning to us – we want to practice what we preach. For us, it’s not about offsetting immediately – we want to be as efficient as we can be within our means.

Our carbon footprint for the 2019 calendar year was 62.1 tCO2e, which consists of the following:

  • Scope 1 emissions 1.9 tCO2e
  • Scope 2 emissions 3.9 tCO2e
  • Scope 3 emissions 56.6 tCO2e
  • Carbon offsets 0 tCO2e

We are committed to reducing our carbon footprint and have set new reduction targets, based on an absolute emissions reduction approach, and following the methodology defined by the Science Based Targets Initiative. Our ambitious targets are as follows and are based on our 2019 footprint:

  • Reducing Scope 1 & 2 emissions to limit warming to 1.5 °C. This equates to a 46.2% absolute reduction by 2030.
  • Reducing Scope 3 emissions to limit warming to well below 2 °C. This equates to a 27.5% absolute reduction by 2030.
In order for us to meet our annual carbon budget for 2020, we are rolling out a range of initiatives, including:

  • Encouraging less travel to customers sites, and engaging selected consulting projects on a ‘Skype and telecon only’ basis
  • Refining our Rental Car policy so that EVs or low-emissions rental cars are hired depending on the location and journey type
  • Reviewing and optimising our air travel patterns, such as combining trips to reduce flights
  • Reporting our monthly carbon emissions alongside our carbon budget as part of our Board papers
  • Holding two cycle campaigns per year to encourage staff commuting to work by bike
  • Reviewing our supply chain and identifying opportunities to switch to low-carbon alternatives

We are looking forward to taking on the challenge of decarbonising our business, while continuing to support our clients on their own low-carbon journeys.
A keyhole in the middle of a forest with trees surrounding it
23 Apr, 2024
In the wake of heightened global awareness about climate change, businesses are grappling with a delicate balance between corporate sustainability commitments and public scrutiny. The complexities surrounding sustainability disclosures are not new, however, concerns about unsubstantiated or misleading climate pledges have intensified. Instances of greenwashing have led to legal repercussions and regulatory crackdowns, underscoring the growing scrutiny surrounding corporate sustainability claims. Moreover, challenges related to the integrity of frameworks such as the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) have further fuelled scepticism about corporate climate action, prompting some companies to remain discreet about their environmental aspirations – helpfully termed green hushing. What’s the difference between greenwashing and greenhushing? Green washing involves the sharing of misleading information or unsubstantiated claims regarding a company's environmental practices or products. It typically manifests through clever marketing campaigns or superficial gestures that prioritise image over genuine sustainable process optimisation efforts. From ambiguous labels to exaggerated eco-friendly claims, green washing undermines consumer trust and dilutes the urgency of authentic sustainability actions. On the other side of the coin, green hushing operates in the shadows of corporate silence, emerging as companies opt to keep their climate targets under wraps to avoid accusations of greenwashing. It occurs when companies downplay or conceal their sustainability initiatives, fearing potential scrutiny or reluctance to be held accountable for their environmental impact. This reluctance to disclose genuine efforts stems from various reasons, including concerns about competitiveness, resource allocation, or simply a lack of understanding about the benefits of transparency. 
A windmill and a globe are balancing on a wooden scale.
23 Apr, 2024
New Zealand has slipped into the second recession of the past 18 months and with raising interest rates in an attempt to curb some of the highest inflation in the developed world, times are tough. Within this challenging financial climate, there is also an urgent requirement to innovate New Zealand’s energy systems to enable secure, reliable and affordable electricity supply while reducing emissions. Substantial investment is needed to get us where we need to be energy-wise – a need to generate an additional 530 MW per year until 2050 with the burden of these costs carried by energy users. Initiatives like the now-defunct Government Investment in Decarbonising Industry (GIDI) Fund in New Zealand and similar programs in Australia shone a light on the willingness of businesses to make change, but they also illuminated how capital-intensive the projects are. If the situation feels bleak, there is solution. While the government strategizes on a national level, locally you can take action. To save money and achieve ambitious sustainability targets, you need tight control of energy consumption and its cost. And you can only control them if you know what they are. Energy management: the key to unlocking change For both households and businesses alike, the current economic landscape requires saving and cost reduction – and this is where energy management comes in. Energy efficiency is the essence of cost-efficiency and effectiveness, optimising existing resources for long term economic advantage – arguably the antidote to challenging environmental and economic times.
by Alessandra Ward 19 Apr, 2024
DETA & Cheetham Salt - Decarbonisation Pathway
Show More
Share by: